Misbah becomes Pakistan's most successful Test captain

Stats highlights from the fifth day of the first Test between Pakistan and New Zealand in Abu Dhabi

Bishen Jeswant13-Nov-201415 Misbah-ul-Haq’s Test wins as captain. He has become Pakistan’s most successful Test captain. He previously held the joint record of 14 wins with Imran Khan and Javed Miandad, both of whom captained Pakistan in more Tests than Misbah.248 Pakistan’s margin of victory in this Test, their second-biggest against New Zealand in terms of runs. Pakistan have won 11 Tests by a margin of 200 runs of more, twice against New Zealand. Three of the 11 wins have come in 2014.5 Number of wickets Pakistan lost in this Test. Only twice previously have they lost fewer wickets in a Test victory. New Zealand feature four times in the top eight entries in the table listing the fewest wickets lost by Pakistan in a Test win .120 The difference between Pakistan’s batting average (145.2) and bowling average (25.4) in this Test – their third highest in a Test victory.1 New Zealand’s Test series wins against Pakistan in the last 45 years. This victory came 29 years ago, in 1985. New Zealand need to win both remaining Tests in the series to improve their record.3 Consecutive Tests Pakistan have won – two against Australia and one against New Zealand. If they win the next Test, it will be the first time since 1990 that they will have won four Tests in a row without the sequence including Bangladesh or Zimbabwe. In 1990, Pakistan had three wins against New Zealand and one against West Indies.52 Pakistan batsmen’s average (51.5) in Tests at the Sheikh Zayed Stadium, Abu Dhabi, their second best for any ground in the world (min. five Tests). They only average more, 53.04, at the Niaz Stadium in Hyderabad, Sind.1 New Zealand’s Test wins over Pakistan in the last 12 years. Post May 2002, New Zealand have played eight Tests against Pakistan, winning one, losing four and drawing three.54 The tenth-wicket partnership between Ish Sodhi and Trent Boult, New Zealand’s highest in the fourth innings against Pakistan, and their fourth highest overall. This is New Zealand’s fourth 50-plus partnership for the tenth wicket in the fourth innings, but their first in Asia.

Spirited Sunrisers exceed expectations

Sunrisers began this tournament as one of the underdogs, but fought impressively to reach as far as the Eliminator

Siddhartha Talya23-May-2013Where they finished
Sunrisers Hyderabad exceeded expectations in this IPL, and had the support of many who backed a side making its debut, having been bought over by a new owner after the previous franchise was terminated last year. Their run ended in a closely-fought Eliminator, and while they’ll be disappointed at not having progressed to the second Qualifier, they went farther than most would have thought possible with the resources they had at their disposal. And their success came at the expense of Royal Challengers Bangalore, a popular franchise with big stars and flamboyant owners.What went right
Sunrisers’ biggest strength was a formidable bowling attack, though only Dale Steyn appeared a serious threat on paper at the time the tournament began. He lived up to his reputation, but was supported ably by the rest, and that combined effort enabled Sunrisers to compensate for the relative weakness in their batting.Ishant Sharma was largely consistent, Darren Sammy had his good days, and the success of the leg-spin combination of Amit Mishra and Karan Sharma stood out. So effective did they prove that a score of 130, especially on a slowish track, seemed secure. Home advantage has been a big feature of this IPL season, and Sunrisers were hard to beat in Hyderabad, winning seven out of their eight matches there, one of them in the Super Over.What went wrong
The bowling unit had its occasional off days, but the batting was Sunrisers’ Achilles heel. Shikhar Dhawan was recovering from a hand injury at the start of the tournament and missed three weeks of his team’s campaign. His return was a boost for the side, at the top of the order, but the overall batting blew hot and cold through the tournament. Sunrisers appeared to rely too much on their bowling to defend targets, and though they put up a spirited fight – even in the Eliminator while defending 132 – the batting depth of the opposing team at times won out.It didn’t help Sunrisers that the going was slow in the first 10 overs, with occasional periods of stagnation when the top and middle order struggled to push on, leaving the likes of Cameron White and Thisara Perera to surge at the death and take them to a par score. Among all teams in this IPL, Sunrisers were the slowest in the first 10 overs, going at 5.85 an over. That climbed to 8.87 in the final five overs, which was the still fifth among all teams.Best player
Without a doubt, Dale Steyn. He was a regular wicket-taker and finished as the second-most economical bowler (min. 20 overs) this IPL, going at 5.66 an over, but what stood out was his intensity and commitment on the field. It seemed each time he came on to bowl, he was bowling a fresh spell. He bowled with pace and regularly ruffled the batsmen with jaffers that nipped away to beat the edge, or were banged in short.He was the most energetic on the field when brought on to bowl, trying desperately to save the single when the ball was knocked around, and celebrated with the kind of excitement we’re accustomed to seeing in Tests. He was Sunrisers’ go-to man in times of a crisis, a responsibility he shouldered well, and was easily the most feared and respected by the opposition.Poor performer
Kumar Sangakkara was one of four overseas captains this season who had to relinquish his place in the side as a result of poor form. His tournament began on a steady note, as he scored 15 against Pune Warriors, but he didn’t push on. He had to sit out after five games, with Cameron White taking over, but did get a chance to return, unlike Ricky Ponting of Mumbai Indians. However, his performances turned out to be worse, with scores of 4, 21, 8, and 3, before he had to sit out again. A player who has expertly anchored innings in his international career, Sangakkara couldn’t fulfil that role for Sunrisers this season, and wasn’t part of the playing XI for half the team’s campaign.Surprise package
The lack of spin options in India has been a worry for a while, and it remains to be seen if Karan Sharma, a legspinner, will allay some of those concerns. For Sunrisers, he was the find of the season, working very well in tandem with senior partner Amit Mishra. He had the variations, imparted considerable turn on the ball, and proved quite economical at 6.60. He was brought on mostly between overs 7 and 14, and picked up nine wickets in that period. This, after an impressive three games for Railways in the Ranji Trophy in which he picked up 21 wickets at 19.04.Recommended for retention
Dale Steyn
Shikhar Dhawan

'Clarke will use his spinners well in Sri Lanka'

Their former coach says that even though Sri Lanka are nearly invincible on home turf, Australia, led by their new captain, can be expected to put up a good fight on this tour

Interview by Daniel Brettig02-Aug-2011″Clarke’s probably the best Australian player of spin: he uses his feet, he’s quick on his feet, and as long as he sticks to that way of playing, he can be successful in Sri Lanka”•AFPHow do you view the challenge confronting Australia?
It’s certainly going to be a test for Michael and the Australian team. Sri Lanka in Sri Lanka – they’ve got a very, very good record. Yes, they’ve got some younger players coming into the team, but those are very good players, and if you add home-ground advantage it is going to be a tough tour.Things have certainly changed a lot since Sri Lanka’s 2007 visit to Australia.

We only played two Tests. [Kumar] Sangakkara missed the first one – he did a hamstring in the warm-up match in Adelaide before that. So we missed quite possibly the best batter in the team in Brisbane and missed that experience and real class at No. 3. It is not an unknown fact that the Sri Lankans when they play away from home on bouncing, seaming wickets as Brisbane can be, it wasn’t one of their favourite surfaces.But in that match I didn’t think we played particularly badly. I thought Australia batted extremely well. We had some plans for one or two of their batters, like Phil Jaques, who I’d been with at NSW not long before. We’d planned to keep the ball outside off stump, but they were just very watchful. I can’t remember them playing and missing, they just left everything that wasn’t in their zone to hit, and over a period time just wore us down. Some of the batters struggled on a bouncier wicket.In the second Test, in Hobart, Sangakkara came back and made 190-odd in the second innings, Mahela [Jayawardene] scored a hundred in the first innings, both superb innings, but the Australians then were still at the top of their game and playing at home and very difficult to beat.They were supremely confident at the time. Ricky Ponting spoke boldly of extending the gap between first and second even though a trio of greats had retired and more would follow.
Any team that’s the No. 1 in the world is usually playing with pretty good confidence, and they were certainly doing that at the time. They still had some of the best players in the world, and to play anyone on their home ground with some of the best players in the world, and six or seven other very good players, it is going to be a difficult assignment, as I think Australia might find out on this tour to Sri Lanka this time round.While you’re obviously familiar with Sri Lanka, you also go back quite a distance with Michael Clarke?
He was the captain of the Under-19s NSW team I coached years ago, and right through there and obviously through his time in NSW. One of the things I think he will do well over there, with wickets favouring spin bowling… tactically I think he’ll handle Australia’s spinners very well, with the field placings. I think he’ll use them pretty well. So that’ll be interesting to see.He will need to make runs with the bat to bolster the team and also his place in the side, having had a poor run over the past year – far from the best lead-in to captaincy.
He’s probably the best Australian player of spin. He uses his feet, he’s quick on his feet, and as long as he sticks to that way of playing, he can be successful in Sri Lanka. I’m sure as the Aussie captain he’ll be out to do as well as he possibly can, not only for the performance of the team but to show people he’s still got what it takes, and he is going to lead this team not only from the captaincy point of view but from his batting as well. I’m sure that’s the type of thing that will motivate him, and I’ve no reason to think he won’t do well in Sri Lanka.How do the Sri Lankan players view Australia?
They realise Australia are not the team they used to be, but at the same time they know that when it comes to Australia it doesn’t matter what team they put on the park – they’re going to have to play some good cricket to win. They certainly won’t be taking Australia lightly.They’re obviously led by two of the best batsmen in the world in Kumar Sangakkara and Mahela Jayawardene, playing on their home turf. Add Thilan Samaraweera to that, who averages 54 in Test cricket and in the last two or three years has averaged 70-odd. Then there’s [Tillakaratne] Dilshan, the new captain, who will want to do well, did well in the Test matches in England.

“From Australia’s point of view, facing and bowling spin over there is a bit different to here because there’s a lack of bounce. A ball that’s not quite a good ball [here] is still a good ball over there because it might do something unpredictable. It might stay a bit low”

Sri Lanka’s batting is a real strength, especially at home. Their top seven batters are all capable of scoring hundreds.The bowling is in more of a transitional state, however.
Lasith Malinga’s retired from Test cricket, Murali’s now retired… theirs will be an inexperienced bowling attack but it certainly won’t lack for skill. From a spin point of view, Rangana Herath has done extremely well in Test cricket and especially in Sri Lanka, he’s gone through a few teams over there that were supposedly good players of spin. Pakistan he destroyed a couple of years ago. Suraj Randiv is the other spinner. Against India last year on a flat wicket at the SSC in Colombo he bowled something like 73 overs on debut, a record for a debut. He’s a big turner of the ball and has got one that goes straight on, and he’s an enthusiastic cricketer. You add Ajantha Mendis to that group of spinners and they could be a headache for Australia.Mendis has a tendency to do well against teams catching their first sight of him, before levelling out as they become familiar with his eccentricities. Have Australia seen enough of him?
Australia have played Mendis in the [World] Twenty20 in the West Indies, and Cameron White hit him for a few runs, but the first two spinners they pick will be Randiv and Herath on current form. That doesn’t mean Mendis won’t play a part. It is a possibility [he will be chosen] against Australia because they haven’t played him very much. Any of those three spinners could do some damage, and besides them there’s another couple of spinners who could quite easily do well in international cricket.Against spin you’ve got to be a bit more proactive, and try to put the pressure back onto the bowler, so it’ll be interesting to see how Australia’s batsmen go about facing the Sri Lankan spinners.Australia’s plan of attack to the Sri Lankan batsmen will have to be quite disciplined, won’t it?
There are going to be some difficult times trying to get through the Sri Lankan batting order. You’ve got seven guys in the likely batting order to whom they’re going to have to bowl very well, and there’s going to be some hard work to get through those seven. Sangakkara and Jayawardene are the main stumbling blocks, and if you can get those two out of the way, it puts a lot of pressure on the rest of the batting order, though you can’t take the rest of the guys lightly.Who stands out to you as an Australia bowler who could have an impact?
From a pace point of view, someone like Ryan Harris could be dangerous. He is someone who bustles in, a bit quicker than what you think, but bowls a fairly consistent line and length, and can nip the ball about off the seam and through the air a bit. Early on with those wickets you get a little bit of swing and a little bit of seam, and someone who maybe skids onto the bat a bit quicker than what you think, and maybe nipping it back in – I think he could do well. Someone who can bowl reverse swing as well, when the ball is older.What about the bowling of spin on those pitches? Is it the old subcontinental formula of landing it on the same spot over after over, with the pitch to provide the variation?
Consistency on any type of wicket is what you’re after. From Australia’s point of view, facing and bowling spin over there is a bit different to here because there’s a lack of bounce. A ball that’s not quite a good ball [here] is still a good ball over there because it might do something unpredictable, it might stay a bit low. In Australia if you drop it short the batter is able to get back and the ball bounces high enough that you can get after it, but in Sri Lanka you’ve got to be a little more careful, you’ve got to make sure it is a really bad ball before you try to go after it.”Suraj Randiv is a big turner of the ball and has got one that goes straight on”•AFPBut at the same time you must put pressure on a bowler to bowl more of those balls. Like anywhere else in the world if you allow a bowler to dictate terms, he’s going to be on top and put the ball where he wants and the fielders where he wants. That’s going to be one of the battles of the Test series.What of Dilshan? How did you view him as a batsman and a leader within your side?
As a player he is one of those guys you probably don’t like playing against. He can rub the opposition up the wrong way at times, and sometime he does it on purpose as well. But he’s a hell of a scrapper. He’s a winner, he likes to win at everything. He’s a very positive batter and he’ll do his best to put pressure on the opposition in any way he can, and I’m sure his captaincy will be the same. In his batting sometimes you’d like to think he’s going to knock the ball around and not get out for a while, but he’s just as likely to come out and score a hundred off 90 balls. From a captaincy point of view he’ll be positive, aggressive, and he’s also got a couple of ex-captains in the team, who I’m sure will be a sounding board for him.However accomplished their results, the Sri Lankans seem to retain the capacity to panic a little when pressure is brought to bear late in a match.
In any situation, in any team there can be panic when you lose wickets, especially when Mahela and Sangakkara get dismissed early. Another way of saying panic is pressure, and that it is brought on by pressure. One of the keys to Australia’s success will be getting Sangakkara and Mahela out, which will then put a lot more pressure on the guys coming in behind them. That’s no different to Australia losing Ricky Ponting, Michael Clarke or Mike Hussey. International teams play each other so often these days, everyone is aware of that.But Australia are going to have to be careful, because even if they get those guys out, the others have stood up to a fair bit in the past two years and done extremely well. You only have to look at the record to see one of the reasons Sri Lanka have done extremely well is that those lesser players have done well. If Australia aren’t careful, just because you get through the best two players in the team, that doesn’t guarantee success, especially with the batting order Sri Lanka have got at the moment.Will there be anything notable about the pitches, or should we expect a succession of slow turners?
Unless there is a washout, there is nearly always a result in Galle, and a bit in it for batsmen and bowlers. Interestingly Kandy is a brand new wicket they had for the World Cup that the Australians haven’t played on, and to be honest the Sri Lankans haven’t played on it much either. It seemed to be a pretty good cricket wicket; probably compared to a lot of the other wickets in Sri Lanka there was more bounce. I wouldn’t say it was fast like an Australian wicket, but in some of the games we played on it, it [had] a little bit in it for everyone. The SSC surface in Colombo is generally quite unforgiving.

England mustn't hide behind victory

Michael Vaughan rated England’s six-wicket win at Old Trafford as one of his best as captain, but the celebrations on the balcony could have been as much out of relief as ecstasy

Andrew McGlashan at Old Trafford26-May-2008
Michael Vaughan: ‘We had to show a lot of mental strength and that pleases me more than anything’ © Getty Images
Michael Vaughan rated England’s six-wicket win at Old Trafford as one of his best, but the celebrations on the balcony could have been as much out of relief as ecstasy. They had managed to overhaul their third largest first-innings deficit, and take the series lead with their fifth-highest successful run chase, barely 24 hours after, in Vaughan’s words, looking “dead and buried”.”You always put it up there when you’ve just won the game, but it’s certainly very close to being as good a win as we have had because of where we were yesterday afternoon,” Vaughan said. “We had to show a lot of mental strength and that pleases me more than anything, that a young side developing showed a lot of character. We didn’t just lie down, we put New Zealand on the back foot and we swayed the game in an hour’s cricket to England’s favour.”The resurgence was sparked by Monty Panesar’s career-best 6 for 37 on the third afternoon and completed by Andrew Strauss’s 106, the sweetest innings he has played since his return to the team. The pitch, which yielded 16 wickets on the third day, was far less threatening after England’s use of the heavy roller and Vaughan was convinced his side could get the runs.”We knew we were chasing the game,” he said. “We had to come out and get early wickets. They got off to a decent start in the second innings, then in Monty’s first three or four overs he was a little nervous and didn’t get the pace right. Then we got [Aaron] Redmond and [Jamie] How out and got on a little bit of a roll. You just sensed that New Zealand would try to attack Monty, and I knew on that wicket we would create opportunities.”It’s amazing how a game can shift in terms of momentum when that happens. Chasing 294 was always going to be difficult, but for some reason, maybe the roller last night or today, we felt very comfortable getting the runs. The ball didn’t seem to be doing it as fast as the first innings so we felt very comfortable.”This was indeed an impressive fightback, any time a team turns around a difference of 179 between innings has shown some real fight. Now for the reality check. This certainly doesn’t mean all is right with England. A better team than New Zealand – and in the second half of the match they lived up to their lowly billing – would not have allowed England back into the match.Having wrestled the match away from New Zealand in such a short space of time, England should now go on and wrap up the series at Trent Bridge. But they should have played far more convincing cricket than they have managed so far. The victory will earn the under-pressure middle-order a reprieve; selectors find it very hard to alter a winning side. Although even another collective failure may not have resulted in any changes given the sheltered existence they appear to live.England’s victory in Napier provided all and sundry with some breathing space, not least the batting line-up. The real danger now is that the warning signs, which flashed red in the first innings at Old Trafford after blinking orange at Lord’s, are ignored again as everyone pats themselves on the back for a win.”The wicket in the first innings was very tricky, I spent 133 balls out there for 30,” Vaughan said in defence of England’s 202 all out. “It was very hard to score. I think we’ve shown in the second innings that, under pressure, this batting unit can be successful. To have Ian Bell and Paul Collingwood hitting the winning runs should give them a massive confidence boost, because they were under a lot of pressure and know that. We don’t panic, everyone talks about scoring rates, but we have won three out of the last four Tests against New Zealand and that’s not a bad return.””We are starting to show some fine traits,” he added. “Napier was a fine victory because we were struggling at one stage, and here we were dead and buried yesterday afternoon. To be sat here talking about winning the game is a great achievement. But there is a lot of stuff we need to work on as well. We still need to bat a little better, bowl better and field better.”Makhaya Ntini, Dale Steyn and Morne Morkel are a formidable pace attack, the best in the world on current form. England can’t afford to be carrying any passengers when the South Africa series starts in July. The selectors were bold in dropping Steve Harmison and Matthew Hoggard, the latter after one poor match, following Hamilton where the batsmen were ultimately to blame for the defeat. They have still to show that the same rules apply to the middle order. The pressure remains on Collingwood and Bell to score big runs, when it matters, at Trent Bridge.Strauss, though, can be exonerated from any criticism. His fine match double continues an impressive run of form. His last four innings have been 177, 63, 60 and 106. “He’s a class act and at this level you need character and mental strength,” Vaughan said. “The players who last longest are the ones that have those. Andrew Strauss has those two attributes in abundance and it’s no surprise at all that he has come back and played the way he has.”The back-from-brink victory reinforces Old Trafford as a stronghold for England. Panesar said after his six-wicket haul that he will be sorry not to bowl here in a Test over the next three years. Vaughan will surely be having a few regrets about not walking out against the Australians here next year. Any ground where England are able to lift themselves from the depths they sank to on the third morning, and emerge with some degree of respectability, clearly must hold some inspirational qualities.

Brandon King, Johnson Charles star as West Indies clinch ODI series against UAE

Hosts were reduced to 95 for 5 at one stage, after Odean Smith’s cameo helped visitors push past 300

Abhimanyu Bose06-Jun-2023Half-centuries from Brandon King and Johnson Charles, a spirited cameo from Odean Smith, and then a ruthless bowling display helped West Indies seal a series win against UAE in Sharjah on Tuesday.The UAE bowlers did well to rein things in after a 129-run opening stand between King and Charles, even as Smith’s 24-ball 37 helped take West Indies past 300. However, another insipid performance with the bat by UAE meant West Indies cantered to victory in the second ODI.After the visitors opted to bat, King, on the back of a fine century in the first ODI, played anchor as Charles took on the role of aggressor against the hosts’ opening bowlers Sanchit Sharma and Ali Naseer.Charles, playing just his second ODI since 2016, hit Sanchit for two boundaries in his first over before smashing 18 of the 20 runs that came off the seventh over, bowled by Naseer. King, meanwhile, hit some gorgeous drives through the off side, as he picked up from where he left off.The two took some time to settle against left-arm spinner Aayan Afzal Khan, but in his third over, they both skipped out of the crease to hit him for sixes down the ground.Charles went on to bring up his half-century – his fifth in ODI cricket – off just 33 deliveries before he went on to hit a six and a four off the next two deliveries he faced. But playing in the afternoon heat, he seemed to tire as he added just two more runs off the next ten deliveries and holed out to long-on for a 47-ball 63 off Naseer.That started West Indies’ slowdown, and they lost wickets in regular intervals after that.King, who brought up a fifty of his own off 52 balls, struggled to put debutant legspinner Adhitya Shetty away, and was soon out to him thanks to a brilliant catch at long-on by Basil Hameed. Shetty nearly had another wicket in that over, but shelled the chance off his own bowling to give Keacy Carty a life.Aayan then had Shamarh Brooks chopping on before getting Roston Chase to hit a half-hearted effort to long-on. Zahoor Khan, who was disciplined in his first spell, returned to the attack to get rid of Carty, who hit a drive straight to cover.Shai Hope, batting at No. 6 – the lowest he has batted in ODIs – rebuilt for West Indies with a 43-run stand with Kavem Hodge, but when the two fell in consecutive overs to Naseer and Sanchit, West Indies were in a spot of bother at 249 for 7.Odean Smith’s quick 37 took West Indies past 300•AFP/Getty ImagesHowever, Smith’s swashbuckling knock, which comprised one six and three fours, helped take them past the 300-mark. Zahoor finished with three wickets, while Aayan, Naseer and Sanchit took two each.Thereafter, it didn’t take the West Indies quicks long to make inroads as debutant right-arm seamer Akeem Jordan, playing in place of Keemo Paul, got UAE captain Muhammad Waseem nicking off in the fourth over.Waseem’s opening partner Aryansh Sharma was next to go, flicking Smith straight to square leg.West Indies’ spin trio of Chase, Hodge and Yannic Cariah then dried out the runs and took away any hopes UAE may have had of trying to upset the visitors: Lovepreet Singh, in his first game for UAE, struggled to get in before Hodge bowled him through the gate. Asif Khan made 4 off 22 balls before a fine catch from Dominic Drakes off Chase saw him return to the hut. Vriitya Aravind, who trudged to 36 off 52 deliveries, was next to go as he sliced a full delivery from Cariah to point.Basil Hameed and Naseer then put on an 80-run stand after UAE were 95 for 5, but having already lost half the side, they couldn’t keep up with the asking rate.Naseer was the only real bright spot with the bat for UAE, smashing three sixes and six fours en route to his 53-ball 57. Having made his ODI debut in the first match of the series, he now has two half-centuries in two games, with both coming at a strike rate of more than 100.Hameed made 49 before holing out to deep midwicket off Chase, and Hodge got Naseer to top edge a slog to short third. Aayan also made a handy 23-ball 25, but in the end, West Indies’ total proved too much for the hosts.UAE were able to bat out fifty overs, but were restricted to 228 after being bowled out for 202 in the first ODI. As for West Indies, the win will be a big confidence booster for them before they – alongside UAE – head to Zimbabwe for the World Cup qualifiers.

Bay FC set NWSL attendance record as they draw more than 40,000 fans against Washington Spirit at Oracle Park

The National Women's Soccer League made history Saturday as Bay FC drew a record-breaking crowd

  • Match attracted 40,061 fans to San Francisco Giants' stadium
  • Surpasses previous mark of 35,038 set at Chicago's Wrigley Field
  • Spirit secured a 3-2 victory to move into second place in standings
  • Getty Images Sport

    WHAT HAPPENED

    The NWSL enjoyed unprecedented attendance when Bay FC hosted the Washington Spirit at Oracle Park on Saturday. The sellout crowd of 40,061 fans packed into the San Francisco Giants stadium.

    The Spirit jumped out to an early 3-0 lead, but Bay FC mounted a comeback, scoring twice to create a tense finish as the visitors ultimately held on for a 3-2 victory.

  • Advertisement

  • WHAT THE NWSL POSTED

  • THE BIGGER PICTURE

    The previous standalone NWSL attendance record was established just last year when 35,038 fans watched Bay FC face the Chicago Stars at Wrigley Field.

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • Getty Images Sport

    WHAT’S NEXT?

    Bay FC will look to build on the momentum generated despite their 3-2 loss to the Washington Spirit when they face Angel City FC on the road on Sept. 1, followed by a home game against KC Current on Sept. 6. 

Man City set Jack Grealish condition that could be huge stumbling block to potential loan exit amid Everton interest

Manchester City have set a condition on Jack Grealish's exit that could prove to be a stumbling block to any potential deal. Everton are keen on signing the City outcast, but they want the winger on loan. Tottenham Hotspur and Napoli are also keeping an eye on Grealish's situation as the England international has acknowledged that his time at Etihad Stadium is up.

Man City set Grealish conditionEverton eye loan move for GrealishTurned down offer from FenerbahceFollow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱WHAT HAPPENED?

According to , Everton had approached Manchester City to initiate talks over a potential loan deal for their out-of-favour star Grealish. The Toffees informed City that they are willing to cover a part of the player's £300,000-a-week wages, although they did not discuss any option of buying in future. 

AdvertisementGetty Images SportTHE BIGGER PICTURE

now reports that the Cityzens will not agree on any loan deal unless the interested club agrees to cover the full salary of Grealish for the 2025-26 campaign. Grealish, who still has two years left in his current contract, fell out of favour under Pep Guardiola last season and has now accepted that an exit from Etihad Stadium is inevitable.

DID YOU KNOW?

Apart from the Toffees, Tottenham Hotspur and Napoli are also interested in signing the England international, while he recently turned down an offer from Jose Mourinho's Fenerbahce. 

ENJOYED THIS STORY?

Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

GettyWHAT NEXT FOR GREALISH?

The 29-year-old missed out on playing for Guardiola's side in their first pre-season friendly, behind closed doors, against Preston earlier this week, and he is unlikely to travel with the team to Italy, where City face sister club Palermo in another preparatory game on Saturday

Danilo fora! Veja as opções de Tite para a lateral direita da Seleção Brasileira

MatériaMais Notícias

Titular na estreia da Seleção Brasileira contra a Sérvia na Copa do Mundo de 2022, o lateral-direito Danilo sofreu uma entorse no tornozelo e será desfalque para os próximos jogos da fase de grupos (Suíça e Camarões). Após passar por exames, o jogador da Juventus precisará ficar de molho visando às oitavas de final, se o Brasil lá estiver.

RelacionadasSeleção BrasileiraMédico da Seleção Brasileira explica lesões de Neymar e Danilo na Copa do MundoSeleção Brasileira25/11/2022Seleção BrasileiraNeymar pode ficar fora da Copa? Entenda lesão no tornozelo e tempo médio de recuperaçãoSeleção Brasileira25/11/2022Seleção BrasileiraSeleção Brasileira: Richarlison ganha 3,5 milhões de seguidores após vitóriaSeleção Brasileira25/11/2022

Vale lembrar que o prazo de convocação já foi encerrado, mesmo diante de contusão, e agora o técnico Tite vai ter que se virar com o que tem. As trocas só poderiam ser feitas até a véspera da partida, na quarta-feira.

+ Veja a tabela, os jogos e os grupos da Copa do Mundo de 2022

E sem Danilo, quem o treinador da equipe canarinha vai escalar diante dos suíços? É o que o LANCE! responde a seguir. Veja as opções.

O primeiro nome é Daniel Alves, substituto natural de Danilo. Aos 39 anos, o veterano recebeu uma chance de Tite no Mundial do Qatar, mas teve o nome contestado por muitos torcedores. Jogando no Pumas, do México, o ala não entra em campo desde setembro e vinha atuando como meio-campista na equipe latino-americana.

Jogador de confiança do treinador, Dani esteve em boa parte do ciclo para a Copa do Mundo e chegou a figurar entre os titulares em alguns momentos. Com função de “interior”, como Tite gosta de dizer, Alves é um atleta que costuma construir jogadas por dentro, característica semelhante à de Danilo.

A outra opção é Éder Militão, que é zagueiro, mas começou a carreira atuando justamente na lateral direita no São Paulo. O defensor do Real Madrid chegou a atuar nesta posição na última Data Fifa, no amistoso contra Gana, e foi bem na função.

Se Tite optar por Militão, não necessariamente estará fazendo uma improvisação. Em entrevista exclusiva ao L! em outubro, o treinador falou sobre a possibilidade de colocar o jogador no setor e lembrou das “raízes” do atleta.

– Ele me disse que o DNA dele começou ali (na lateral), foi onde ele explodiu no São Paulo. Não é uma improvisação, improviso é fazer algo que tu nunca fez. O que o Militão te traz? Segurança defensiva e saindo como surpresa, às vezes ele faz isso no Real Madrid, mesmo como zagueiro, ele dá um “turbo”, antecipa e sai.

+Neymar fora da fase de grupos: relembre outras lesões que o atrapalharam na Seleção

Sem Danilo e também sem Neymar, o Brasil encara a Suíça na próxima segunda-feira, às 13h (de Brasília; 19h no horário local), no Estádio 974. O jogo é válido pela segunda rodada do Grupo G da Copa do Mundo. Quem será o titular do técnico Tite na lateral direita? Façam suas apostas.

Jonathan Trott: Afghanistan batters have adapted to pace of ODIs

Head coach Jonathan Trott breaks down the reasons behind the change in Afghanistan’s batting approach

Ashish Pant02-Nov-2023

Azmatullah Omarzai and Hashmatullah Shahidi have given Afghanistan stability•Associated Press

Soaking up pressure and adapting their T20 skills to the pace of ODIs are the reasons for Afghanistan’s batting success at the World Cup, according to their head coach Jonathan Trott ahead of a crucial game against Netherlands in Lucknow.Coming into the tournament, Afghanistan’s middle order had the lowest average of all Full Member nations in ODIs since the start of 2021 – 26.44. That number has gone up to 36.93 in the World Cup, the fifth best in the tournament.Related

Jonathan Trott: 'If people are going to have to play like Maxwell did to beat us, I can't complain'

Clinical, risk-assessed, productive – Afghanistan's batting evolution unlocks new highs

Rahmat Shah, the odd one out in Afghanistan's band of T20 stars

Crafty Azmatullah Omarzai on his way to be Afghanistan's own Hardik Pandya

Afghanistan turn to careful cricket for unprecedented success

“I think it’s a case more of just being better all-around, and thinking more about your all-around game,” Trott said in Lucknow on Friday. “Afghanistan [players] naturally grow up playing a lot more T20 cricket than any other format, so the skills for T20 are there. It’s about adding to that sort of base of T20 skills. As you see, 50-over cricket is a long time and you have to be able to, I think, ride the sort of ebbs, and flows of a game.”While openers Rahmanullah Gurbaz and Ibrahim Zadran have been scoring consistently, it hasn’t gone bust when they have not fired. In their previous game against Sri Lanka, Gurbaz fell for a four-ball duck but Rahmat Shah stepped up and had half-century stands with Ibrahim and Hashmatullah Shahidi, who in turn put on 111 with Azmatullah Omarzai to finish the chase.”The thing I’m really happy about from the last game is we lost a wicket in the first over and Rahmat Shah was able to go into No. 3 and soak up that pressure but still kept scoring at a good tempo,” Trott said. “That shows the ability to soak up pressure at times, what you have to do in 50-over cricket, but also then accelerate at certain times.”Rahmat Shah has been unfazed even when Afghanistan have lost an early wicket•AFP/Getty Images

Trott also stressed on the importance of the batters who are in to stay till the end and finish the job, especially while chasing.”I think when chasing those targets, we saw just what is possible if you have a good solid start and you have batsmen in the last ten overs,” he said. “That’s happened for us, but it’s also happened against us in games where it’s been difficult to stop the opposition with set batters in the last ten overs.”Having that sort of vision, knowing that you can score quickly towards the back end of games, I think that’s the pennies we’re starting to see drop with the players.”Afghanistan have managed to walk the talk, especially in their previous two games, against Pakistan and Sri Lanka where they chased down targets of 283 and 242 with ease.”Obviously, there’s a difference between talking about it and actually going out and doing it. And we’re seeing players go out and do it now,” Trott said. “We’ve spoken a lot about it and worked really hard to try and achieve it, so it’s nice to see the players do well and have a smile on the face when they’re there batting at the end of the game, having chased in the last two games and won.”

Gabriel Martinelli's Arsenal future in serious doubt! Gunners consider selling Brazil winger to clear space on wage bill

Gabriel Martinelli's Arsenal future is reportedly in serious doubt as the Gunners consider selling him to clear space on their wage bill.

Article continues below

Article continues below

Article continues below

  • Martinelli's future hangs in the balance
  • Arsenal remain open for offers
  • Value him at around £50 million
Follow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱
  • WHAT HAPPENED?

    Though Arsenal have communicated their desire to retain their key players, and still regard Martinelli as one of them, internal discussions are increasingly shaped by financial realities and squad restructuring objectives ahead of the 2025–26 season. However, with significant business planned in the transfer market this summer and pressure mounting on Mikel Arteta to deliver silverware, Arsenal are ready to hear offers for the Brazilian to lighten their wage bill, as revealed by

  • Advertisement

  • GOAL

    THE BIGGER PICTURE

    has revealed that Arsenal would demand over £50 million ($67m) should any suitor express serious interest in acquiring Martinelli. The current contract runs until 2027, and the club holds an option to extend it by an additional year. Hence, the Gunners are in a position to call the shots if any suitor comes knocking.

  • DID YOU KNOW?

    Beyond Martinelli, the Gunners could put several others on the chopping block to trim their wage burden. Oleksandr Zinchenko and Reiss Nelson, both reportedly earning upwards of £100,000 per week, are now viewed as expendable. In addition, Jakub Kiwior, Fabio Vieira, and Albert Sambi Lokonga could be put up for sale.

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • AFP

    WHAT NEXT FOR ARSENAL?

    Arsenal plan to reinforce multiple areas of the pitch. A new left winger and central forward are top priorities, alongside additions in midfield, central defence, and backup goalkeeper roles. Real Sociedad’s Martín Zubimendi is poised to arrive in a £51m ($69m) move, whereas talks are ongoing to bring in Chelsea’s Kepa Arrizabalaga for £5m ($6.75m) to serve as a backup keeper.

    Viktor Gyokeres remains the primary target up front, though Arsenal and Sporting CP have yet to reach an agreement on the terms for the Slovenian striker. The club is hoping to complete most of their key acquisitions before pre-season training begins in early July.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus